Download our free E-booklet “5 important tips you must know immediately for your injury case”

Tomkiel & Tomkiel successfully secured a $5.26 million settlement for a construction worker who suffered severe injuries due to a workplace accident, including a burst fracture at L1 and cauda equina syndrome, caused by negligence and violations of Labor Law 240 and 241.

Tomkiel & Tomkiel Secures $5.26 Million Settlement in Devastating Construction Accident

The Case:

  • Plaintiff: A 35-year-old shipping supervisor.
  • Defendants: Prompt Apparel, Inc., Prompt Realty, LLC, Marcel Mirror & Glass Products, Inc., New York City Industrial Development Agency, Beckie Realty Co., and the City of New York.

The Incident:

This case involved a construction worker who was severely injured while working on a new dropped ceiling installation at a warehouse in Brooklyn, New York. The incident occurred on August 25, 2006, when the worker was standing on a 6-foot stepladder to position a light fixture. He received an electric shock, causing him to fall to the floor.

The Claims:

The worker alleged that the defendants were responsible for his injuries due to their negligence. Specifically, he claimed they violated Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 by failing to provide a safe work environment, including:

  • Failure to provide a platform or scaffold for proper foot positioning.
  • Failure to identify and de-energize electric circuits in the ceiling.

The Injuries:

The fall resulted in devastating injuries, including:

  • Burst fracture at L1 with permanent spinal cord damage
  • Conus medullaris injury with cauda equina syndrome
  • Bilateral lumbar radiculopathies
  • Neuropathic pain syndrome
  • Herniated disc at L5-S1
  • Mechanical axial lumbar pain syndrome

The worker required extensive surgery, including an L1 corpectomy, T12/L1 and L1/L2 discectomy, fusion with bone graft, and mesh titanium cage with screw and rod instrumentation. He continues to suffer from neurogenic bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction.

The Defense:

The defendants denied responsibility for the worker's injuries, arguing that the incident was an unfortunate accident and not a result of their negligence. They also brought third-party claims against the worker's employer and an HVAC contractor.

Our Approach:

Tomkiel & Tomkiel meticulously investigated the incident, gathering evidence that clearly demonstrated violations of Labor Law 240 and 241 by the defendants. We presented expert medical testimony highlighting the devastating, long-term impact of the worker's injuries, emphasizing his inability to return to work.

We also effectively navigated the complexities of third-party claims, ensuring our client's case remained strong and focused. Our team's dedication to thorough preparation and effective communication played a key role in achieving this successful outcome.

The Outcome:

Despite the complex legal arguments and third-party claims, Tomkiel & Tomkiel successfully secured a $5,260,000 settlement for the worker, a testament to our firm's skill in handling complex construction accident cases.

Key Takeaways:

This case highlights the importance of:

  • Workplace Safety: This case underscores the crucial role of workplace safety and the need for employers to adhere to Labor Law requirements, ensuring a safe environment for all workers.
  • Protecting the Rights of Injured Workers: Tomkiel & Tomkiel is committed to vigorously protecting the rights of injured workers and seeking the maximum compensation they deserve for their injuries and losses.
  • Understanding Legal Complexities: This case demonstrates the intricacies of construction accident law and the need for skilled legal representation to navigate the complexities of these cases.

If you have been injured in a construction accident or another workplace accident, contact Tomkiel & Tomkiel immediately for a free consultation. We are dedicated to fighting for the rights of injured workers and achieving a just outcome for our clients.

Please note: This case study is just an example. Every situation is different, and results can vary.

Disclaimer: Each legal case is unique. For specific legal guidance, please consult with an attorney.